PRO TV sau PRO LGBT

                                                                    

Mai multe televiziuni din Romania au devenit in ultimul timp sutinatoare fervente ale comunitatii LGBT (adica a homosexualilor ,lesbienelor , bisexuali, transexuali etc.) printre acestea PRO TV a fost una din cele mai active . In urma cu caterva zile Stirile PRO TV criticau virulent voluntarii care distribuiau pliante despre referendum pe motiv ca acestia raspandeau neadevaruri referitoare la pericolul acceptarii casatoriilor intre pesoane de acelasi sex.
 Insa PRO TV nu a putut aduce nici o dovada asupra faptului că ce spun voluntarii de la Coalitia pentru familie refereritor la consecintele casatoriilor homosexualilor nu este adevarat . Afirmariile celor de la Coalitia pentru familie sunt veridice si pot fi oricand dovedite .

                                                                        



In data de 30.09. 2018  aceiasi televiziune și-a dovedit din nou loialitatea si sustinerea față de homosexuali trasmitand un amplu repeortaj despre o demonstratie a catorva homosexuali și lesbiene (circa 150 persoane ) care sustineau  ideea ca casatoria intre cupluri LGBT ar fi un drept fundamental al omului . Afirmatia acesta insa nu are nici un fundament legal , Curtea Europeana a drepturilor omului , e negat ca casatoria intre persoane de acelasi sex ar fi un drept fundamental.

CURTEA EOROPEANA A DREPTURILOR OMULUI: CASATORIILE HOMOSEXUALE NU SUNT UN DREPT AL OMULUI - Curtea de la Strasbourg -Franta spune clar
*EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE IS NOT A HUMAN RIGHT*
*Judgment of the Human Rights Court of Strasbourg -France*
*Unanimously, the World Court of Human Rights has established, verbatim, that "there is no right to homosexual marriage." The 47 judges of the 47 countries of the Council of Europe, which are members of the full Court of Strasbourg (the world's most important human rights court), issued a statement of great relevance that has been surprisingly silenced by information progressivism and its area of ​​influence. In fact, unanimously, the 47 judges approved the ruling that "there is no right to homosexual marriage." The sentence was based on a myriad of philosophical and anthropological considerations based on natural order, common sense, scientific reports and, of course, positive law.Within the latter, in particular, the judgment was based on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This is equivalent to the articles of human rights treaties, as in the case of 17 of the Pact of San José and nº 23 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In this historic but not disclosed, Resolution, the Court decided that the concept of family not only contemplates "the traditional concept of marriage, that is, the union of a man and a woman", but also that they should not be imposed on governments to "obligation to open marriage to persons of the same sex". As for the principle of non-discrimination, the Court also added that there is no discrimination, since "States are free to reserve marriage only to heterosexual couples."*
It is important and absolutely necessary to spread this kind of news because governments and sympathisers of such lobbies will not want people to know. Help spread if you want!


                                                                         


...